Nothing Ventured Nothing Gained

Andrew Findlay | Image: Peter Holst | Published: July 07, 2010
Print this article Email this article
Text sizetext sizetext sizetext size
Fundamental-Technologies-5.jpg

Small Victories: With massive buyouts becoming increasingly rare, angel fund manager Basil Peters says the traditional VC model is dying.

It’s been a dreadful few years for the 
venture capital field, a situation made markedly worse by the recession and a growing aversion to risk. Can things be turned around? Or is a new funding model in order for B.C.’s startups?


The venture capital world, while not exactly dead, has clearly seen better days. Last year, according­­ to analysis by Thomson Reuters and Canada’s Venture Capital & Private Equity Association, venture capital (VC) deal activity in Canada fell to its lowest level since the mid-’90s, down to $1 billion from $1.4 billion the year previous. In B.C. – where there are roughly 10 active VC funds with $1.8 billion in assets under management, accounting for 20 per cent of all VC deal flow in Canada – the experience mirrors national trends: in 2005 roughly $225 million of venture capital was invested by these funds; last year saw just $141 million.


A lack of market liquidity has resulted in a dearth of initial public offerings (IPOs) and mergers and acquisitions (M&A), leading to poor fund performance. Institutional investors with fiduciary responsibilities have fled VC for safer investments, and once-bedrock local VC funds are struggling. GrowthWorks, for example, is posting three-year returns in the negative seven-to-10 per cent range – what one Vancouver financier politely describes as “nothing to write home about.” In December 2009, the B.C. Discovery Fund ceased redemptions after paying out $5.2 million to investors, and in January managers of the $23-million Pender Growth Fund informed shareholders that they could only meet 55 per cent of share-redemption requests for the time being, blaming “reduced opportunities for near-term liquidity in the fund’s portfolio.” In early May, the B.C. Advantage Fund temporarily suspended redemptions of its two VC funds, also citing a lack of cash. 


Venture capital belongs to a rather esoteric realm of finance not that well understood by the general public. It thrives on word-of-mouth tips rather than public financial statements, so getting fund managers to discuss strategy candidly is at times like trying to crack military code. (Then there’s the somewhat blurry line between venture capitalists and so-called angel investors, who, rather than entrust their investments to a VC fund manager, prefer to do the investing themselves or pool with other angels. Both offer a combination of equity and business experience to help entrepreneurs bring their prototypes to commercial stage or inject a boost of capital to early-stage companies enabling them to grow to the next level.) If they bet on a winner, venture capitalists can expect to realize a return on investment (in the form of an IPO or an acquisition) within a five-year horizon for IT or within 10 to 15 years for the more capital-intensive clean-tech sector. But, as indicated by the litany of stumbling VC funds, shareholders have had little to cheer about recently. And according to a June 2009 report from the U.S.-based Kauffman Foundation, things could soon get worse: it predicts a monumental rightsizing that could see annual VC investment contracting by 50 per cent in North America in the coming years. Which raises the question, Is venture capital in Vancouver a barely flickering, soon-to-be-extinguished flame of high-risk finance, or does it remain a going concern? BCBusiness talked with a handful of the province’s VC specialists to find out. 


Print this article Email this article
Text sizetext sizetext sizetext size

print


Comments

First, this was a great and

Comment by chaworth, July 30, 2010 at 07:42

First, this was a great and timely article - congrats to Andrew Findlay and BC Business.

Second, we need more constructive and less adversarial comments to achieve collective success.

From our recent 27th Angel Forum, three companies got firm commitments from attending investors:
• Indel Therapeutics got $175,000 of investor interest to close in August.
• Hatsize Corp got $100,000 of investor commitments to close by Sept 30.
• A third company has a term sheet for undisclosed amount

Angel syndication is a developing trend where angels may syndicate both locally and out of region, through established Angel groups such as the Angel Forum. For eample Alberta based Hatsize Corp obtained $100,000 in investment commitments from two Angel Forum investors. Hatsize has received over $2 million in Angel investment commitments from 42 Angels located across the US and Canada, demonstrating how syndicated Angel transactions can be equivalent in dollars to Canadian VC investments. The investors are from Florida, Toronto, New York, Boston, San Francisco, Waterloo, Calgary and Vancouver. While this may be an exception, syndication through a local angel group is becoming a trend. A caution note is that most angel investors if located outside of the company’s local region (ie BC) , generally will only look at deals if sponsored by local investors.

Bob Chaworth-Musters, Angel Forum-Vancouver

(1)
(12)

I wonder if hybrid angel

Comment by Anonymous, July 12, 2010 at 15:22

I wonder if hybrid angel funds are part of the answer. I have been impressed by Common Angels in Boston MA. Common Angels raises small funds from angels and then co-invests with its angel partners. This let's them do meaningful early investments ($600K plus) and then follow on as needed. They seem to be doing well. Basil's fund may be organized along these lines.
But there is also a role in the economy for successful private companies. I remember that Jimmy Pattison once said something along the lines of only taking his least successful companies public and keeping the best ones private. I was impressed by the Hermann Simon (of Simon Kucher) book Hidden Champions of the 21st C on the need for focussed, usually private companies, that dominate a niche. The BC economy will only prosper if we have strong, private companies that are locally controlled and owned and that have robust growth. The VC imperative of a liquidity event in 5-7 years (3 years for poorly managed funds) is poison for many of the most innovative companies. Alternative mentoring and financing approaches are needed and angels have an important role to play here.
There will be some ongoing need to VC finacing in BC, and I hope we see some new funds with new blood (Vanedge sounds promissing). But I think the angels will be more important and that we need to find ways to make them (us) successful.
I have based my own new venture in Cambridge MA. There are a number of reasons for this, but one of them is that there is a larger, better organized, and more experienced angel community. Perhaps I will be able to do a future company in Vancouver with local angels (a group I aspire to join).

(3)
(16)

Venture Capital in Western

Comment by Anonymous, July 8, 2010 at 00:20

Venture Capital in Western Canada has a sordid history, particularly in the tech industry, of mostly fouling otherwise viable, creative businesses founded by smart entrepreneurs.

When founders pitch them, they gather together and form a cabal in order to force down valuations and drive punitive terms into deals; and once you've taken their money you're badgered by MBA know-it-alls with no industry experience, connections, or domain knowledge.

Encounter challenges in your business and they do the only thing they know how to do -- fire you, hire some diffident greyhair who takes down an unsustainable salary and ends up owning more of the company than you do while he sucks up the office's internet bandwidth watching his Slingbox in the corner office.

Then, at the first sign of an easy exit they're all-to content to exercise their leverage and liquidation preferences to sell the company just as it's hitting it's stride... they get a 5x return while founders get very little.

Indeed, there's not much to recommend this experience and founders who've managed to scratch out success amidst this turmoil swear up and down they'll never do it again.

What BC needs is a little creative destruction wrought by a powerful band of angels. The void created by the implosion of the venture firms will be filled by more capable investors, perhaps from south-of-the-border, who have a more nuanced understanding and longer view of entrepreneurship and partnership rather than operating on a deal-by-deal basis like they're running a convenience store.

Venture Capital is not dead... we just need to shake out the fail whales.

(2)
(23)

Great Article. As a local

Comment by stephen cronin, July 7, 2010 at 16:39

Great Article. As a local tech entrepreneur, I can offer a small additional insight. There is no mention here about communication between entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists. They often don't want the same things.

VC should be much more hungry for deals. So far the only investors I've talked to since starting up were American and they took an hour to phone up and be friendly (while grilling me for details). None of that funk about decks or proper introductions, just sales and relationship development. I relate better to that type of investor because they want business bad and will go the extra mile to find it, just like me.

It's often just a better decision to go and get sales yourself and avoid the hassle of trying to get attention from Angels and VC; no disrespect intended. If an angel had a deep network that set up a chance at 8-10 relationships with enterprises, I probably wouldn't even care about money; I've been eating Raman noodles bootstrapping for 2 years and its kind of a comforting way of life.

Its just a disconnect between what matters (growth and sales) and what doesn't (short term security and inflating valuation by cash infusion). Communicating deep networks and access to people that can open up sales pipelines is far more valuable then $1,000,000 with massive conditions and devaluation of my interest.

(4)
(26)

Post new comment

Please login or register to post your comment immediately under your username. We accept anonymous comments, but they must first go to an approval queue.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options


BCBusiness, winner of the 2007 BC/Yukon Magazine of the Year, is British Columbia's foremost business authority and the most widely read business publication in the province. As the interactive web companion to BCBusiness magazine, BCBusiness Online is your source for practical business information and thought-provoking commentary. The site is designed to encourage online exploration of our top stories in addition to unique web content, such as podcasts, video, blogs, slideshows, and more. The site is fully searchable.
© 2010 Canada Wide Media Limited