Controversy in B.C. Employment Standards
If employment standards aren’t enforced, will B.C. lose its honest employers?
It’s perhaps not surprising that a search for one of Vancouver’s major roofing contractors leads to a less-than-picturesque part of town. Speeding transport trucks rattle the windows of the repair shops and equipment suppliers that line East Kent Avenue North, a two-lane road running directly underneath the Knight Street Bridge. A railway lies to one side, a steam-belching factory next to that, and the Fraser River somewhere beyond. There’s a wicked tang in the air, maybe from the nearby fish plant; it smells like someone’s cooking a few tonnes of seaweed in ammonia.
Richard Skujins, co-owner of Cambie Roofing and Drainage Contractors Ltd., works out of a small spotless office across the road from the railway. He’s spent all his working life in roofing, taking after his father, uncle and grandfather. But while the business has been good to the family, it also has an ugly side. Roofing is intensely competitive, and the sector is rife with fly-by-night operators who flaunt workplace standards to score contracts. And for someone like Skujins, who prides himself on his company’s good relationship with workers, that’s a growing problem.
“I bet you we’re the only company out there that pays overtime,” says the fit, confident 40-year-old, straight-faced under the brim of a ball cap. “It does take a part of our bottom line. Absolutely.”
Cambie Roofing employs between 80 and 130 workers, depending on the season, and treating them right has been part of the corporate culture since his father, Knute, bought the company about 40 years ago, Skujins says. It’s the kind of place where workers can expect Christmas parties and company barbecues. But that kind of tradition can put a financial strain on a company in today’s hypercompetitive marketplace.






Save over 50% off the newsstand price with a subscription to BCBusiness Magazine

BCB magazine publishes a
Submitted by mbrodie (not verified) on Fri, 2010-10-29 07:52.The article seems to imply
Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 2010-07-05 09:59.This is so typical of B.C
Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 2010-07-02 14:33.