Ten Debt Sentences

1972 Sapporo Winter Games

1972 Winter Olympic Games: Sapporo, Japan

These were the first Winter Olympics held outside of Europe and North America, and the Japanese spared no expense in an attempt to impress, spending an astronomical $688 million. The ski runs were scooped out of mountainsides; the men’s slalom course alone required the removal of more than 12,000 cubic metres of rock, most carried out on human backs.
Austrian skiing champion Karl Schranz was banned from the Games by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) for accepting money from ski companies. In response, Schranz’s supporters threatened to burn the home and kill the children of Karl-Heinz Klee, president of the Austrian Ski Federation.
The Games raised the profile of Sapporo and its annual Snow Festival and helped establish the city as a major conferencing and sporting destination.
1976 Innsbruck Games

1976 Winter Olympic Games: Innsbruck, Austria

Innsbruck became the site for the 1976 Games after the citizens of Denver, the original bid-winner, voted in a 1972 public referendum against playing host.
Instead of extravagance, the Austrians opted for modesty and thrift, dubbing the show “the Simple Games.” There was no stadium built for the opening ceremonies and no expensive pageantry.
In the wake of the massacre of Israeli athletes at Munich in 1972, the security-conscious Austrians hired 5,000 police and soldiers to patrol the Tyrolean town and the Olympic sites. “It looks like a POW camp,” said Italian figure skater Susan Driano.
Because Innsbruck had hosted the Winter Games in 1964, the Austrians had the benefit of having much of the necessary infrastructure in place and savvy, experienced management. The total cost was $85.6 million. All the facilities were put to use afterwards. “There are no Olympic ruins at Innsbruck,” declared Olympic committee spokesman Bertl Neumann.
1980 Lake Placid Games

1980 Winter Olympic Games: Lake Placid, USA

Placid chose the slogan Welcome World, We’re Ready, but the tiny resort town (population 2,800) was anything but prepared. Because there were only 5,600 beds, the 50,000 daily visitors had to find accommodations in distant towns and cities. Olympic organizers banned public cars from the vicinity of town and created a series of outlying parking lots from which buses would ferry spectators to the venues. The plan went badly awry: drivers got lost, buses were late arriving and there weren’t enough of them. Catastrophe was averted when state governor Hugh Carey declared a limited state of emergency and authorized the importing of more buses and drivers.
The Games ended with a $6-million deficit and the Lake Placid Olympic Committee preparing bankruptcy papers. New York State eventually came to the rescue with a bailout.

1984 Sarajevo Games

1984 Winter Olympic Games: Sarajevo, former Yugoslavia

Socialist Yugoslavia wanted to host the Games for capitalist reasons: to transform the Sarajevo region into a winter sports destination and boost tourism. At the time, Yugoslavia was beset with an inflation rate of 50 per cent, a $20-billion foreign debt and high unemployment. Public support for the venture was high: when the government proposed raising taxes to pay for Olympic construction costs, the move was approved by 96 per cent of voters.
Although the Yugoslavian government had to borrow funds from foreign banks and the IOC to finance the Games, the organizing committee later recouped its costs thanks to licensing agreements, sponsorships, advertising, donations, tickets and the sale of television rights.
The euphoria was short-lived. Eight years later the country was engulfed by ethnic warfare and Sarajevo besieged, its ski slopes riddled with bunkers, its hotels scorched by rocket fire and its Olympic grounds covered with grave makers.
1988 Calgary Games

1988 Winter Olympic Games: Calgary, Canada

Calgary’s entrepreneurial approach, which supposedly resulted in a $150-million operating profit, is often cited as an example of how to stage a financially successful Winter Games. However, a 1999 investigation by the Toronto Star revealed that Calgary’s organizing committee omitted the cost of building sports facilities from its figures as well as $461 million in government subsidies. Include them and the Games lost money.
It was not the only shortfall. The promised low-income housing never materialized, an estimated 50 per cent of the available tickets went to IOC insiders (resulting in large blocks of empty seats at many events) and Canada won no gold medals.
The most positive legacy of Calgary’s Games was the construction of state-of-the-art sports facilities, most notably the Olympic Oval – the world’s first fully enclosed speed skating rink, which would produce a steady stream of future Canadian Olympians.
1992 Albertville Games

1992 Winter Olympic Games: Albertville, France

Albertville landed the Games hoping to revitalize an ailing economy and stimulate flagging tourism in the French Savoy Alps. Because all the various municipalities in the region wanted a piece of the action, the 57 Olympic events were spread out over 13 locales and 620 square kilometres, which produced a logistical nightmare.
The French government spent $1.1 billion on regional infrastructure. Another $189 million was invested in building or upgrading sports facilities. Organizers declared a loss of $67 million.
An expected boost in tourism did not materialize for Albertville, which instead found itself saddled with a huge deficit caused by cost overruns. Other towns in the region suffered the same fate, while some places, such as Courcheval and Val d’Isere, prospered from the improved transportation links.
1994 Lillehammer

1994 Winter Olympic Games: Lillehammer, Norway

The Norwegians confounded skeptics by staging a successful Winter Olympics in a sleepy town of 23,000 inhabitants that had virtually no major sports supply businesses, facilities or infrastructure.
These were the first “green Games.” Recycling was stressed, cars were banned within a 60-kilometre radius of the venues and contracts signed with sponsors and suppliers contained environmental clauses. Contractors of the luge and bobsled runs were fined $7,400 for every tree that was needlessly damaged.
But despite predictions about the Olympics’ positive impact on tourism, within a few years 40 per cent of the hotels built in and around Lillehammer for the Games had gone bankrupt and two large alpine skiing facilities built for the Games had been sold for less than $1 to prevent bankruptcy.

1998 Nagano Games

1998 Winter Olympic Games: Nagano, Japan

Dark rumours swirled as to why Nagano, a city of garish urban sprawl, with no airport and at the same latitude as Algiers, won the Games. The Nagano Olympic Committee spent $800 million on sports facilities, including $80 million for a ski jump with an Astroturf surface for summer use and $100 million for a bobsled and luge course. Most of these facilities fell into expensive disuse after the Games.
The Japanese government built a new bullet train between Tokyo and Nagano that reduced the travel time from three hours to 79 minutes, but it cost $7 billion.
Virtually everything ran over budget, though no one is sure of the true deficit because 90 volumes of accounting documents mysteriously disappeared. In 1999 Nagano committee vice-secretary-general Sumikazu Yamaguchi admitted, “I ordered them burned. I didn’t want the IOC members to feel uncomfortable.”
2002 Salt Lake Games

2002 Winter Olympic Games: Salt Lake City, USA

Before the Games, the leaders of the Salt Lake City Olympic Organizing Committee had to resign after being accused of spending millions of dollars to improperly influence the votes of 14 IOC members. The payments included cash, all-expense-paid ski trips, college tuition payments and free plastic surgery.
Salt Lake spent $2 billion (including $500 million for security), which works out to a staggering $114 million per day or $817,000 per athlete. While organizers reported an overall $101-million profit, critics claim this figure omitted federal government subsidies.
The Olympics brought international acclaim, dozens of new and faster lifts and thousands more hectares of skiable terrain to the region. Traffic on the slopes was up by 37 per cent in the six years after the Games, turning Utah skiing into a US$1-billion industry.
2006 Turin Games

2006 Winter Olympic Games: Turin, Italy

Turin hoped the Games would revitalize a sagging local economy that had been devastated by the collapse of the Fiat empire.
The lead-up to the Olympics was a litany of monetary headaches, construction gaffes, political infighting and financial scandal. In 2004 police charged nine executives from the company contracted by the government to build the 65 infrastructure projects needed for the Games, accusing them of fixing bids and abusing their authority.
Attendance fell short of predictions, possibly because the online ticketing process was plagued by malfunctions, while a $215-million shortfall in the Games’ $3.6-billion budget was blamed on lacklustre sponsorship support from corporations. The difference was made up by the Italian government.
Turin would become only the second Winter Olympics in the last 30 years to report a deficit.
2010 Vancouver Games

2010 Winter Olympic Games: Vancouver, Canada


The Winter Games will have undeniable benefits for B.C. now and in the years to come. But as Olympics history shows us, the experience isn’t exactly priceless.

You can count on three things being true with the Winter Olympics: the initial cost estimates for staging the Games will be underestimated, the Games will almost certainly lose money and organizers will claim they made a profit. Yet all this appears to be forgotten every four years when a new city hosts the Winter Games, which on a per capita basis actually cost more to put on than their summer equivalent. With that in mind, we examine the money trail from the past 10 Winter Olympics.

Related Links
Reader Comments
Leave Your Comment
If you'd like to post a comment, please or . When submitted, your comment will be queued for approval.

Please note: If you were registered on the old BCBusiness website, your account no longer exists. Please take five seconds to create a fresh account.
The closing sentence of 'Lessons Learned' (Feb. '10), "Turin would become only the second Winter Olympics in the last 30 years to report a deficit" is totally incongruous with the tone of the rest of the article, which provided a glimpse of the economics surrounding Winter Olympics back to Sapporo, Japan in 1972. According to the piece, Lake Placid and Albertville reported deficits, which would make Turin at least the third Winter Olympics since 1980 to do so, with the finances of the vast majority of the remainder clearly leaving room for debate. Given the 'sell/con job' that the Olympics (both Winter and Summer) are, I believe the author was correct in the first instance when he/she wrote, "the initial cost estimates for staging the Games will be underestimated" (can everyone say 'Security'?), "the Games will almost certainly lose money and the organizers will claim they made a profit". And given that, I think we really need to consider why the 'paying' public allow ourselves to be used like this - "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice" (or more), "shame on me".
Why does everything have to be about money? The atmosphere we are currently experiencing in Vancouver is unlike anything I have ever witnessed. Yes, there are the usual party fans, and some protestors that obviously didn't think very much about the reaction to their actions, but all in all, the mood in the entire city is upbeat and even friendlier than I can ever remember. I live about an hour outside the city and visit often, and the Olympics have reminded us all that we are friends and neighbours no matter our address. Will it make money? Probably not - but the benefit of re-humanizing the city is worth it. The most telling result for me will be the final disposition of the "affordable housing" built to eventually assist those less fortunate citizens. Let's hope greed doesn't put that promise in the dumpster.
Hi Kerry - interesting 'money trail' here. Thanks for this! Economist Dr. Jeffrey Owen of Indiana State University has written a compelling business case in "Estimating The Cost and Benefit of Hosting Olympic Games" that makes you wonder how any wannabe host city manages to convince anybody that funding this bloated Olympic-sized party is a good thing. It's shocking, for example, when Dr. Owen joins other senior economists in exploding what he calls the myth of Olympic Games and their financial benefits: “To date, there has not been a single study of an Olympics or other large-scale sporting event that has found empirical evidence of significant economic impacts.” Dr. Owen also maintains that the prevalence of economic impact studies has led to automatic acceptance of their findings by the public, the media, even among academic circles with little or no critical evaluation - not to mention countless billable hours from all those happy economic impact study consultants. “Because of the high profile of such events, large (and positive) economic effects are taken as given; the studies confirm what is already believed.” More on this at: "Why The Olympics Are Bad Business" at The Ethical Nag: Marketing Ethics for the Easily Swayed: http://www.ethicalnag.org/2010/02/14/olympics/
poll

What's your communication weapon of choice?

What's your communication weapon of choice?

Choices

S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
 
 
 
Save over 50% off the newsstand price with a subscription to BCBusiness Magazine Subscribe Now
Other BCBusiness Features
Online and in print, BCBusiness articulates the trends and issues affecting business in BC. The award-winning BCBusiness, essential companion to corporate titans and entrepreneurs alike, delivers provocative BC business news and commentary on traditional and digital platforms: videos, articles, blogs, and columns addressing all aspects of business in BC, including management, marketing, leadership, innovation, technology, careers, human resources, finance, and entrepreneurship. Vancouver small business owners, managers, CEOs, and digital entrepreneurs prize BCBusiness for its signature mix of analysis and opinion on the issues and people shaping business in BC. Join BCBusiness on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn - and at the premier West Coast business networking events, like BC's Top 100 Companies, Entrepreneur of the Year, BC's Top Innovators, and Best Companies to Work for in BC.