

There is a pattern that societal changes seem to follow. Early adopters rush in, others gradually follow, and eventually widespread acceptance is the new norm. The change is either then accepted and we move on, or there is a revolt. I think we’ve hit widespread acceptance of social media. Will we revolt or adapt and move on?
I was at a lunch put on by the Urban Development Institute last week, and one of the speakers exhorted the assembled throng of real estate developers to embrace social media. I’ve been telling our real estate developer clients to do this for since 2008. But now one of their own is finally on the soapbox with me.
We’ve all seen the statistics. Staggering numbers of people of all ages and socio-economic categories have embraced these new networking and sharing tools. There is nary a TV commercial or billboard or print ad remaining anywhere across the land that doesn’t include a Facebook address or a Twitter feed link. Traditional media have stopped taking pot shots at social media, and have instead incorporated these tools into their reportage. I think we can safely say we’ve reached the tipping point.
And so, as could be expected, the signs of rebellion have started. Just as the last reluctant holdouts are resigning themselves to participating, others are starting to turn away. Twitter’s growth has slowed dramatically. Monocle Magazine is declaring Social Media dead, and is trumpeting the arrival of Slow Media, a phrase stolen from the Slow Food movement. Even our own esteemed scribe Tony Wanless is opening admitting that he’s on a social media diet. If you look at many other sectors of popular culture (food, interior design, fashion, etc.) the trend is towards the slower, the hand-made, the well crafted, the small, and the beautiful. Can the sleek shiny fast-paced tech-savvy world of social media continue in the face of this kind of cultural opposition? Will we tweet as we sip artisanal tea infusions from hand-thrown pottery cups in our antique Danish chairs on reclaimed barn-wood floors wrapped in our heirloom Amish quilt?
This is the closing paragraph where I am supposed to state my opinion and support it with a few pithy proofs. But I don’t know what to say. Part of me thinks that social media is an entirely new world-view, and that the collaborative communities it has spawned are too desirable and too efficient to ever be rent asunder. Another part of me is weary of all the effort and the chatter, and still enjoys the Sunday newspaper with a proper espresso, reveling in the opportunity to think, slow down, and disconnect. So I’ll end my observational rant with a question. What do you think? Is social media going to become the new Sony Walkman, destined to gather dust in the junk drawer of the internet? Or is it here to stay as an accepted and integral part of how we live our lives?
Comments
Mix one part Social Media
Comment by Anonymous, January 29, 2010 at 17:17Mix one part Social Media with a good integrated marketing plan, lots of common sense, a lot of hard (and tedious) work to tweet, twit and twat on every influencer blog, page and site.
It doesn't work in a vacuum on its own.
Kudos to all the consultants bottling this common sense into books and hyping projects and fooling people that its magic, leaving them with zero results.
To understand what I mean please check out the social media guru video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKCdexz5RQ8&fmt=18 PG-13 rating for language
I think social media is far
Comment by Anonymous, January 27, 2010 at 18:39I think social media is far from being dead. Mobile apps are just the beginning. I'm waiting for the day when phone networks become obsolete, and mobile Skype becomes the preferred way to communicate with each other. Of course there will be the earpiece die-hards who don't mind looking like they're talking to themselves... but one can dream.
Sandra, Middle Child Marketing
Hi David: Thoughtful post to
Comment by Tony Wanless, January 27, 2010 at 14:55Hi David:
Thoughtful post to be sure.
I agree that the two forces seem to be counter prevailing, as you so aptly described in your comment about tweeting "while we sip artisanal tea infusions from hand-thrown pottery cups."
But perhaps they are not: It could be that people are really just trying to incorporate the micro with the macro to create some balance.
For some insight on this, I refer everyone to John Husband's comment on my post Sick of Social Media II.
Tony
Excellent post as usual,
Comment by Hilary, January 27, 2010 at 13:32Excellent post as usual, David. My feeling is and has been that while particular platforms, such as Twitter, may not last, the medium and concept are here for the long haul. And for the very reasons you state as antithetical to social media.
The Slow Food movement, just as the handmade and DIY revolutions underfoot, is predicated on a need for more cohesive and supportive communities. And social media only helps in these ends, explaining the simultaneous proliferation of crafting, cooking and hobbiest blogs.
When I log into Twitter I find my community waiting for me. We share similar values and interests, and I appreciate the friend culture that is implicit in the exchanges I have with others from my city, my industry, my subjects of interest and my world. And just as with live face-to-face interactions, much of our enjoyment in interacting comes from the exchange of information and of personal experience we share.
There's also a duty to be credible and authentic because, as you become more prolific, you build a name for yourself (i.e., a brand) and everything you say is recorded and indexed so that you may be held accountable.
I truly do believe that the format lends itself to a better, more compassionate world and is at the crux of finding true democracy. It also speaks to the very nature of human beings, social creatures at our core, increasing our ability to bond and cooperate as we navigate the tricky decisions that must be made in the interest of us all.
—Hilary Henegar, Granville Online editor (@granvillemag)
Media, has inherently always
Comment by Anonymous, January 27, 2010 at 12:45Media, has inherently always been social, if it is interesting. This thing we bundle up and call social media at this moment of time will likely fade away as all media adopts social tools as part of the consumption experience. All part of the evolution as all media becomes digital and connected in some way to the net. This is not a case of digital over traditional, that is overly simplistic, as this bundle of things we arbitrarily call "digital" will lose the tag as it all just becomes media.
A "thing" like Twitter may fade (or maybe not, who knows, predicting the future is a fools game of the arrogant) but these different ways of sharing and communicating with people we know or like (aka the Social Graph for the lingo-aholics out there) will likely persist and hopefully in ever more interesting ways. Hopefully brands will expand their definition of social media to all media - act in a more sociable way - provided they have something interesting to say, truly want to be transparent and stand up to it.
Post new comment