

As road closures start to take effect in the City of Vancouver, and with TransLink encouraging businesses and commuters in Metro Vancouver to plan for “business as unusual,” many companies may be taking a second look at the impact of the Games on the ability of their employees to get to work, or on customer demand.
Retail and Food and Beverage businesses have long been planning for extended hours and night time shipping and receiving because of the Olympics.
As these plans roll out, surprised employees often ask whether their employers can require them to work seven days a week or change their start times to much later in the evening or early in the morning. In short, the answer is “yes,” provided that the employer also complies with Part 4, Hours of Work and Overtime sections of the B.C. Employment Standards Act.
Of course, the answer can be more complicated for those employees who have been promised a fixed schedule in their employment contracts, or who are unable to accommodate such changed schedules due to family care requirements. If an employee can show that the changed schedule results in a “serious interference with a substantial parental or other family duty or obligation,” then the employee will be protected by the Human Rights Code and be able to refuse to comply with the changed schedule. For a recent decision that examined when an employee is able to seek the protection of the Human Rights Code.
One alternative to dealing with the road closures and extra volume on transit routes is to work from home. For those employees and employers who are able to make this work, there are a few things to keep in mind.
Ultimately the 2010 Olympics is a short-term event, while most employer-employee relationships last much longer than that. Thus, it is in the best interests of everyone to be flexible when dealing with the expected and unexpected challenges the games will bring, and hopefully, to have a little fun along the way.
This blog is written by Nicole Byres of Clark Wilson LLP and made available by BCBusiness to provide general information on employment law, and is not a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. Neither the reading of this blog, nor the sending of unsolicited comments or emails creates a lawyer-client relationship with the writer or Clark Wilson LLP.
Comments
Thanks for the comment. You
Comment by CW Legalist, February 15, 2010 at 16:42Thanks for the comment. You are correct, the concept of working remotely is not new. However, as an employment lawyer, I frequently see situations where the fundamentals (expectations, hours of work etc) have not been dealt with up front, with the result that later there is a dispute between the parties (usually when the employer is not happy with the quality or quantity of work, or when the employee leaves and claims for more hours worked than the employer thinks were authorized). The article was intended to point out some of these issues, especially for those who may be new to this-as in people telecommuting for the first time during the 2010 Games.
I find this article very
Comment by Anonymous, February 11, 2010 at 22:41I find this article very interesting in that the concept of working remotely is not a new one. The technology to support remote work has existed for years... probably about a decade. The element that must evolve is the mutual trust to enable broader acceptance. The parties in this trusting relationship simply need to be open and transparent about, as the author pointed out, expectations. Telecommuting is a big part of sustainable business models, and therefore should be embraced going forward, and not just for a few weeks in February 2010.
Post new comment